Back to search

Article

Combining MAVEs and computational predictors improves variant classification across ancestries in hereditary cancer genes

2025-12-09

Abstract excerpt

Many commonly used computational tools for variant effect prediction exhibit ancestry-related bias because they are trained on clinical or population datasets that under-represent global diversity, leading to uneven and sometimes unfair variant classification across ancestries. Multiplexed assays of variant effect (MAVEs) and population-free VEPs instead offer alternatives that are unbiased with respect to human a...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
91a98376-250d-5086-914f-f699ae91142d
DOI
10.64898/2025.12.08.25341119
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Combining MAVEs and computational predictors improves variant classification across ancestries in hereditary cancer genesDOI 10.64898/2025.12.08.25341119
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.