Back to search

Article

The Peril of Ignoring Cross-Sectional Dependence in Global Health Panels: Analysis of Digital Infrastructure and Rehabilitation-Relevant Disease Burden

2026-06-17

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p> Background Cross-country panels in health-services research often assume cross-sectional independence, an assumption violated by shared technology cycles, diagnostic conventions, and global shocks. Ignoring Cross-Sectional Dependence (CSD) biases estimates and inflates significance. We quantify these empirical costs using a policy-relevant test case: whether national digital infrastr...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
8fee45f4-21b2-5754-a45e-322fc6098136
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10051048/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
The Peril of Ignoring Cross-Sectional Dependence in Global Health Panels: Analysis of Digital Infrastructure and Rehabilitation-Relevant Disease BurdenDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10051048/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.