Back to search

Article

AUTOMATED VERSUS MANUAL REANALYSIS IN RARE DISEASE GENOMICS

2026-05-19

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Purpose</h4> Periodic reanalysis of genome sequencing data can yield additional diagnoses as knowledge evolves, yet manual reanalysis is labour-intensive. We compared automated and manual reanalysis approaches in rare disease genomics. <h4>Methods</h4> We reanalyzed 377 rare disease cases: 158 with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) findings, 49 with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) findings, and...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
85faff12-60bc-513b-9ed7-3c4995ddc2d0
DOI
10.64898/2026.05.16.26352295
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
AUTOMATED VERSUS MANUAL REANALYSIS IN RARE DISEASE GENOMICSDOI 10.64898/2026.05.16.26352295
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.