Back to search

Article

A comparison of two methods for estimating measurement repeatability in morphometric studies

2020-05-09

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Summary</h4> Measurement repeatability is often reported in morphometric studies as an index of the contribution of measurement error to trait measurements. However, the common method of remeasuring a mounted specimen fails to capture some components of measurement error, and could therefore yield inflated repeatability estimates. Remounting specimens between successive measurements is likely to provide more...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
859151b5-b2b3-560a-88c6-041dd5635926
DOI
10.1101/2020.05.07.083428
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A comparison of two methods for estimating measurement repeatability in morphometric studiesDOI 10.1101/2020.05.07.083428
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.