Back to search

Article

No Evidence Against the Greater Male Variability Hypothesis: A Commentary on Harrison et al.’s (2022) Meta-Analysis of Animal Personality

2022-01-14

Abstract excerpt

<p>In a recent meta-analysis, Harrison, Noble and Jennions (2022; Biological Reviews, 97, 679-707) set out to test the greater male variability hypothesis with respect to personality in non-human animals. Based on their non-significant results, they concluded that there is no evidence to support the hypothesis, and that biological explanations for greater male variability in human psychological traits should be ca...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
848347bc-74ec-585f-ad63-ee36749489d1
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/6ua8r
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
No Evidence Against the Greater Male Variability Hypothesis: A Commentary on Harrison et al.’s (2022) Meta-Analysis of Animal PersonalityDOI 10.31234/osf.io/6ua8r
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.