Back to search

Article

The Case for Interpretable Geometry: Statistical Shape Models vs. Curvature-Based Descriptors in Aortic Disease Classification

2026-07-31

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Purpose</h4> Quantifying aortic morphology is central to surgical planning for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), yet no consensus exists on how best to represent three-dimensional aortic shape for outcome prediction. Two broad strategies have emerged: statistical shape analysis (SSA), which relies on statistical methods and dimensionality reduction to capture the most significant shape modes, and g...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
8307b4a2-7572-594e-95bd-7eaa7d4772f1
DOI
10.64898/2026.07.29.26359299
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
The Case for Interpretable Geometry: Statistical Shape Models vs. Curvature-Based Descriptors in Aortic Disease ClassificationDOI 10.64898/2026.07.29.26359299
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.