Back to search

Article

Five Structural Biases in Neurofeedback-for-ADHD Research: Why the Evidence Looks Weaker Than It Should

2026-04-24

Abstract excerpt

<p>Background. Neurofeedback is the most extensively studied non-pharmacological intervention forattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The most recent meta-analysis (Westwood et al.,2025) reports no clinically meaningful group-level advantage over control conditions (SMD = 0.04).Several secondary findings in the same literature, however, do not sit comfortably with a purenull, including delayed separati...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
816e34ef-b100-5120-970e-229eb130a74c
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/hb2eq_v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Five Structural Biases in Neurofeedback-for-ADHD Research: Why the Evidence Looks Weaker Than It ShouldDOI 10.31234/osf.io/hb2eq_v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.