Back to search

Article

How do the public interpret COVID-19 swab test results? Comparing the impact of official information about results and reliability used in the UK, US and New Zealand: a randomised, controlled trial

2020-12-04

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> <h4>Objectives</h4> To assess the effects of different official information on public interpretation of a personal COVID-19 PCR (‘swab’) test result. <h4>Design</h4> A 5x×2 factorial, randomised, between-subjects experiment, comparing four wordings of information about the test result and a control arm of no additional information; for both positive and negative test results. <h4>Setting</h4> Onl...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
80acedf7-ebcb-5e5b-95a5-f94e795f5fb2
DOI
10.1101/2020.12.04.20243840
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
How do the public interpret COVID-19 swab test results? Comparing the impact of official information about results and reliability used in the UK, US and New Zealand: a randomised, controlled trialDOI 10.1101/2020.12.04.20243840
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.