Back to search

Article

Gender differences in attentional processes and attractiveness evaluation models during gait observation

2024-09-12

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Introduction: Physical attractiveness plays a crucial role in building interpersonal relationships and in daily communication. Attractiveness is perceived through nonverbal information regarding one’s morphological features, posture, movement, and behavior. Selective pressures throughout our species’ evolutionary history have shaped sex differences in the evaluation of physical attract...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
7e2dd8dd-bacc-5a69-b81a-7fef4a76428d
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-5071832/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Gender differences in attentional processes and attractiveness evaluation models during gait observationDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5071832/v1
The Gender Attractiveness GapSemantic proximity
Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces.Semantic proximity
Physical cues of partner qualitySemantic proximity
Functional Inferences of Mating Orientations Through Body Fat and Sex-Typical Body FeaturesSemantic proximity
A cross-cultural study of sex-typicality and averageness: Correlation between frontal and lateral measures of human facesSemantic proximity
Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes.Semantic proximity
Does attractiveness in men provide clues to semen quality?Semantic proximity
Sex Categorization from Faces: Other-race and other-species effectSemantic proximity
Male facial attractiveness and masculinity may provide sex- and culture-independent cues to semen quality.Semantic proximity
Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men.Semantic proximity
No evidence for an association between facial fluctuating asymmetry and vocal attractiveness in men and womenSemantic proximity
No association between body dissatisfaction and attentional bias towards lower-weight bodies in non-clinical sample of women: an eye-tracking study.Semantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.