Back to search

Article

Anatomical Accuracy of Generative AI for Congenital Heart Disease Illustrations: Gemini NanoBanana Versus ChatGPT Models in a Blinded Comparative Study

2026-02-23

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly used to produce medical illustrations for education; however, their anatomical accuracy in complex domains such as congenital heart disease (CHD) remains insufficiently validated. <h4>Methods</h4> In an assessor-blinded comparative study, we evaluated AI-generated CHD illustrations from two contemporary text-to-image platforms (...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
7bd8ffa2-7997-5f24-b253-0af5a13dbe89
DOI
10.64898/2026.02.21.26346792
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Anatomical Accuracy of Generative AI for Congenital Heart Disease Illustrations: Gemini NanoBanana Versus ChatGPT Models in a Blinded Comparative StudyDOI 10.64898/2026.02.21.26346792
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.