Back to search

Article

2D or Not 2D? An FMRI Study of How Dogs Visually Process Objects

2020-06-05

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> Given humans’ habitual use of screens, they rarely consider potential differences when viewing two dimensional (2D) stimuli and real-world versions of dimensional stimuli. Dogs also have access to many forms of screens and touch pads, with owners even subscribing to dog-directed content. Humans understand that 2D stimuli are representations of real-world objects, but do dogs? In canine cognition...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
7a9828d9-a6ca-5935-be0a-20b5b11b66ae
DOI
10.1101/2020.06.04.134064
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
2D or Not 2D? An FMRI Study of How Dogs Visually Process ObjectsDOI 10.1101/2020.06.04.134064
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.