Back to search

Article

Are ordinal rating scales better than percent ratings? A statistical and “psychological” view

2007-05-01

Abstract excerpt

Disease incidence and severity are often assessed by either an ordinal rating scale, e.g., with scores from 1 to 9, or a percentage rating scale. This paper compares three different rating scales regarding accuracy, precision, and time needed for scoring. Pictograms of mildew diseased cereal leaves were generated following a right skewed beta-distribution. Persons with different rating experience were asked to rat...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
77fe1193-3053-5674-9c68-93afe3fbe07e
DOI
10.1007/s10681-006-9296-z
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Are ordinal rating scales better than percent ratings? A statistical and “psychological” viewDOI 10.1007/s10681-006-9296-z
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.