Article

Linguistic Markers of Inherently False AI Communication and Intentionally False Human Communication: Evidence from Hotel Reviews

2023-01-30

Abstract excerpt

<p>To the human eye, AI-generated outputs of large language models have increasingly become indistinguishable from human-generated outputs. Therefore, to determine the linguistic properties that separate AI-generated text from human-generated text, we used a state-of-the-art chatbot, ChatGPT, and compared how it wrote hotel reviews to human-generated counterparts across content (emotion), style (analytic writing,...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Uncategorized literature

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 746cccaa-2908-5db8-8153-091410c409be
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/mnyz8

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Linguistic Markers of Inherently False AI Communication and Intentionally False Human Communication: Evidence from Hotel ReviewsDOI 10.31234/osf.io/mnyz8Read

Can AI tell good stories? Narrative Transportation and Persuasion with ChatGPTSemantic proximity Read

Simulated Souls: Investigating the Emotional Fallacy in Large Language ModelsSemantic proximity Read

Discerning Human and AI-Generated Content in Short- Form TextSemantic proximity Read

Polite AI mitigates user susceptibility to AI hallucinationsSemantic proximity Read

Human vs. Machine: Comparing AI-generated and Human-written Psychological ReportsSemantic proximity Read

How funny is ChatGPT? A comparison of human- and A.I.-produced jokesSemantic proximity Read

AI chatbot responds to emotional cuingSemantic proximity Read

Detecting AI Generated Content in Short Form TextSemantic proximity Read