Back to search

Article

Accuracy of dipole source reconstruction in the 3-layer BEM model against the 5-layer BEM-FMM model

2024-05-21

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Objective</h4> To compare cortical dipole fitting spatial accuracy between the widely used yet highly simplified 3-layer and modern more realistic 5-layer BEM-FMM models with and without adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) methods. <h4>Methods</h4> We generate simulated noiseless 256-channel EEG data from 5-layer (7-compartment) meshes of 15 subjects from the Connectome Young Adult dataset. For each subject, we...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
7187b163-1401-5046-9a7e-86443ddb37e6
DOI
10.1101/2024.05.17.594750
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Accuracy of dipole source reconstruction in the 3-layer BEM model against the 5-layer BEM-FMM modelDOI 10.1101/2024.05.17.594750
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.