Back to search

Article

The NLP-to-Expert Gap in Chest X-ray AI

2026-03-02

Abstract excerpt

In previous work, we achieved state-of-the-art performance on ChestX-ray14 (ROC-AUC 0.940, F1 0.821) using pretraining diversity and clinical metric optimization. Applying the same methodology to CheXpert, we received similar results when using NLP valuation and test data—but when evaluated against expert radiologist labels, performance was only 0.75-0.87 ROC-AUC. The models had learned to match the automated NLP...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
6b2ada84-3460-5104-ae22-1bbc03e9ed80
DOI
10.64898/2026.02.27.26347261
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
The NLP-to-Expert Gap in Chest X-ray AIDOI 10.64898/2026.02.27.26347261
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.