Back to search

Article

Randomized controlled trials do not support efficacy of any of the tested doses of fluvoxamine in prevention of disease progression in adults with incipient non-severe COVID-19 disease: a case-study systematic review and meta-analysis

2026-04-03

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> Recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) claimed efficacy of higher-dose fluvoxamine (2 x 100 mg/day, as opposed to 2 x 50 mg/day) in prevention of disease deterioration in adults with mild - moderate COVID-19 disease. <h4>Objectives</h4> Investigate whether such claims are supported by the data. <h4>Methods</h4> Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating highe...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
6ad9a6e4-19b2-55fb-83ae-7a77eaaadba6
DOI
10.64898/2026.04.01.26349972
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Randomized controlled trials do not support efficacy of any of the tested doses of fluvoxamine in prevention of disease progression in adults with incipient non-severe COVID-19 disease: a case-study systematic review and meta-analysisDOI 10.64898/2026.04.01.26349972
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.