Article

How convincing are AI-generated moral arguments for climate action?

2023-03-10

Abstract excerpt

<p>Mobilizing broad support for climate action is paramount for solving the climate crisis. Research suggests that people can be persuaded to support climate action when presented with certain moral arguments, but which moral arguments are most convincing across the population? With this pilot study, we aim to understand which types of moral arguments based on an extended Moral Foundation Theory are most effective...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Uncategorized literature

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 6a54c355-387b-56f6-a7a7-f0ddd01e4ea7
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/q8hsr

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

How convincing are AI-generated moral arguments for climate action?DOI 10.31234/osf.io/q8hsrRead

Addressing climate change skepticism and inaction using human-AI dialoguesSemantic proximity Read

Dissecting the persuasiveness of AI writing in climate change articles: Emotion frames, perceived message qualities, and linguistic traitsSemantic proximity Read

AI Language Model Rivals Expert Ethicist in Perceived Moral ExpertiseSemantic proximity Read

Can conversational AI influence confidence in pre-existing political beliefs?Semantic proximity Read

“Real proof instead of over hyped up bullshit”: Exploring what would change people’s minds about climate change using OpenAI’s GPTSemantic proximity Read

Artificial Intelligence Can Persuade Humans on Political IssuesSemantic proximity Read

Exploring Large Language Models' Responses to Moral Reasoning DilemmasSemantic proximity Read