Back to search

Article

Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory research

2021-05-21

Abstract excerpt

<p>We argue that critical areas of memory research rely on problematic measurement practices and provide concrete suggestions to improve the situation. In particular, we highlight the prevalence of memory studies that use tasks (like the “old/new” task: “have you seen this item before? yes/no”) where quantifying performance is deeply dependent on counterfactual reasoning that depends on the (unknowable) distributi...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
6722942a-4c18-5514-ad26-3672f5cad07d
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/qd75k
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory researchDOI 10.31234/osf.io/qd75k
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.