Back to search

Article

Comments on “Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Benefits and Costs in the Clean Air Act Rulemaking Process”

2021-09-16

Abstract excerpt

Were this anti-regulatory NPRM—or any logical outgrowth of it—to be finalized, it would result in repeated violations of the Clean Air Act and the Administrative Procedures Act. The problematic methodologies being codified in this NPRM would often generate nonsensical, arbitrary results, and would promote multiple biases that undermine the goals of the Act.<br><br>It is unfortunate that the Trump administration is...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
6628305a-0c15-5a15-914a-a894bf6ca21a
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.3923773
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comments on “Increasing Consistency and Transparency in Considering Benefits and Costs in the Clean Air Act Rulemaking Process”DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3923773
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.