Back to search

Article

Can Risk Scoring Systems Guide the Selection of Laparoscopic Repair in Emergency Perforated Peptic Ulcer? A Retrospective Cohort Study

2026-08-10

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) carries substantial morbidity and mortality and remains a true surgical emergency. Laparoscopic repair is now used more often, but whether it outperforms open surgery is debated, partly because patients selected for laparoscopy differ from those taken to open surgery. Whether clinical risk scores or inflammatory markers can guide this choice is...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
6334092a-c1ae-5dd5-a59b-e278b3c50a95
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10263220/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Can Risk Scoring Systems Guide the Selection of Laparoscopic Repair in Emergency Perforated Peptic Ulcer? A Retrospective Cohort StudyDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10263220/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.