Back to search

Article

(Dis)concordance of comorbidity data and cancer status across administrative datasets, medical charts, and self-reports

2020-02-12

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Benchmarking outcomes across settings commonly requires risk-adjustment for co-morbidities that must be derived from extant sources that were designed for other purposes. A question arises as to the extent to which differing available sources for health data will be concordant when inferring the type and severity of co-morbidities, how close these are to the “truth”. We studi...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
629755c9-d5a9-56e3-902e-cd1fa293d251
DOI
10.21203/rs.2.14363/v2
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
(Dis)concordance of comorbidity data and cancer status across administrative datasets, medical charts, and self-reportsDOI 10.21203/rs.2.14363/v2
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.