Back to search

Article

Re-evaluation and Re-analysis of 152 research exomes five years after the initial report reveals clinically relevant changes in 20%

2022-10-01

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> Iterative re-analysis of NGS results is not well investigated for published research cohorts of rare diseases. We revisited a cohort of 152 consanguineous families with developmental disorders (NDD) reported five years ago. We re-evaluated all reported variants according to diagnostic classification guidelines or our candidate gene scoring system (AutoCaSc) and systematically scored the validity...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
61f8b363-52c9-5fef-85c4-47bee8a4329b
DOI
10.1101/2022.10.01.22280361
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Re-evaluation and Re-analysis of 152 research exomes five years after the initial report reveals clinically relevant changes in 20%DOI 10.1101/2022.10.01.22280361
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.