Article

Influence of switching rule on motor learning

2018-01-05

Abstract excerpt

Humans and animals can flexibly switch rules to generate appropriate motor commands; for example, actions can be flexibly produced toward a sensory stimulus (e.g., pro-saccade or pro-reaching) or away from a sensory stimulus (e.g., anti-saccade or anti-reaching). Distinct neural activities are related to pro- and anti-movement actions; however, the effects of switching rules on motor learning are unclear. Here, we...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Uncategorized literature

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 6148d5f2-6e6b-5c2d-9cfa-6e2d673c6540
DOI: 10.1101/243386

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Influence of switching rule on motor learningDOI 10.1101/243386Read

Motor LearningSemantic proximity Read

Motor LearningSemantic proximity Read

Motor learning without movementSemantic proximity Read

Plan-based generalization shapes local implicit adaptation to opposing visuomotor transformationsSemantic proximity Read

Can patients with cerebellar disease switch learning mechanisms to reduce their adaptation deficits?Semantic proximity Read

Target configuration determines how and what we learn during sensorimotor adaptationSemantic proximity Read

Motor adaptation does not differ when a perturbation is introduced abruptly or graduallySemantic proximity Read

Generalizing movement patterns following shoulder fixationSemantic proximity Read

Intermanual transfer of visuomotor learning is facilitated by a cognitive strategySemantic proximity Read

Changes in Muscle Synergy Structure and Activation Patterns Underlie Force Field Adaptation, Retention, and GeneralizationSemantic proximity Read

Top-down effects in motor generalizationSemantic proximity Read

Prior movement of one arm facilitates motor adaptation in the otherSemantic proximity Read