Back to search

Article

Why More Doctors May Not Mean More Essential-Specialty Physicians in Korea: A Paradox of Expansion

2026-01-01

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> I present an illustrative conceptual model of how economic and legal disincentives may drive specialty and practice-setting misallocation in South Korean essential medicine, alongside—not instead of—aggregate workforce constraints, examined through the “Vital 5” specialties (Internal Medicine, General Surgery, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Pediatrics, and Cardiothoracic Surgery). <h4>Methods</h4>...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
5a248f55-1d83-5e31-8214-1b2742e4e98d
DOI
10.64898/2025.12.25.25343018
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Why More Doctors May Not Mean More Essential-Specialty Physicians in Korea: A Paradox of ExpansionDOI 10.64898/2025.12.25.25343018
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.