Back to search

Article

Clinical judgement of General Practitioners for the diagnosis of dementia: a diagnostic test accuracy study

2020-11-23

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> The accuracy of General Practitioners’ (GPs’) clinical judgement for dementia is uncertain. <h4>Aim</h4> Investigate the accuracy of GPs’ clinical judgement for the diagnosis of dementia. <h4>Design and Setting</h4> Diagnostic test accuracy study, recruiting from 21 practices around Bristol. <h4>Method</h4> The clinical judgement of the treating GP (index test) was based on the information imme...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
5857ca21-f9c1-5ff1-b9e8-6fd88d7d2649
DOI
10.1101/2020.11.20.20234062
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Clinical judgement of General Practitioners for the diagnosis of dementia: a diagnostic test accuracy studyDOI 10.1101/2020.11.20.20234062
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.