Back to search

Article

Is it Cake or is it AI? A Systematic Review of Human Uncertainty in Distinguishing Generative Artificial Intelligence Content

2026-04-06

Abstract excerpt

<p>This systematic review synthesized empirical evidence on human ability to distinguish generative artificial intelligence content from human‑produced content across text, image, and voice modalities. A structured search of Scopus identified 22,541 records from 2025-2026, of which 1200 were screened and 30 studies were included. Across these studies, human detection accuracy varied widely but generally clustered...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
584f9cb0-63c3-54fb-9c6e-978f3e632ae9
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/j7wd5_v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Is it Cake or is it AI? A Systematic Review of Human Uncertainty in Distinguishing Generative Artificial Intelligence ContentDOI 10.31234/osf.io/j7wd5_v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.