Article

Modelling wildlife-human relationships for social species with mixed-effects resource selection models

2008-06-01

Abstract excerpt

1. Resource selection functions (RSF) have contributed to the conservation of species negatively affected by human activities. Despite these applications, two assumptions frequent many studies: the assumption of independence among groups in social species, and that selection is proportional to resource availability. This latter case is known as a functional response in resource selection, and may be especially imp...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 57326868-7cce-5cfb-8458-ec95b819fc2b
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01466.x

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Modelling wildlife-human relationships for social species with mixed-effects resource selection modelsDOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01466.xRead

Wolves at the door? Factors influencing the individual behavior of wolves in relation to anthropogenic featuresSemantic proximity Read

Hunting and human disturbance affect red deer activity more than natural predators in a human-dominated landscapeSemantic proximity Read

Human disturbance impacts on wildlife sociality and group sizesSemantic proximity Read

The role of human-related risk in breeding site selection by wolvesSemantic proximity Read

Addressing the challenges of research on human-wildlife interactions using the concept of Coupled Natural & Human SystemsSemantic proximity Read

Social implications of human food subsidies on wildlife populationsSemantic proximity Read

Designing the landscape of coexistence: Integrating risk avoidance, habitat selection and functional connectivity to inform large carnivore conservationSemantic proximity Read

Landscape change shifts competitive dynamics between declining at-risk wolverines and range-expanding coyotes, compelling a new conservation focusSemantic proximity Read

Artificial selection in human-wildlife feeding interactions.Semantic proximity Read

When, where, and how prey pair antipredator behaviors to natural and anthropogenic mortality risksSemantic proximity Read

Wolf habitat selection is shaped by human activities in a highly managed boreal forestSemantic proximity Read

Human disturbance is the most limiting factor driving habitat selection of a large carnivore throughout Continental EuropeSemantic proximity Read