Back to search

Article

Human Researchers are Superior to Large Language Models in Writing a Systematic Review in a Comparative Multitask Assessment

2025-06-13

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Background</bold> The capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to support and facilitate research activities has sparked growing interest in their integration into scientific workflows. This paper aims to evaluate and compare against human researchers the performance of 6 different LLMs in conducting the various tasks necessary to produce a systematic literature review.<bold>Met...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
52b6c153-22fb-5bdc-bb5e-25dfbae2aeed
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-6863946/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Human Researchers are Superior to Large Language Models in Writing a Systematic Review in a Comparative Multitask AssessmentDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6863946/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.