Back to search

Article

A comparison of large language model versus manual chart review for extraction of data elements from the electronic health record

2023-09-01

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Structured Abstract</h4> <h4>Importance</h4> Large language models (LLMs) have proven useful for extracting data from publicly available sources, but their uses in clinical settings and with clinical data are unknown. <h4>Objective</h4> To determine the accuracy of data extraction using “Versa Chat,” a chat implementation of the general-purpose OpenAI gpt-35-turbo LLM model, versus manual chart review for h...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
4fe71c2c-3883-57ad-991f-2488af50b0d3
DOI
10.1101/2023.08.31.23294924
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A comparison of large language model versus manual chart review for extraction of data elements from the electronic health recordDOI 10.1101/2023.08.31.23294924
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.