Back to search

Article

The Brain in a Vat and the Fourth Proposition: Why the Constitution of the Psychoanalytic Subject Exceeds Computational Sufficiency

2026-06-25

Abstract excerpt

A Large Language Model fabricated a reference to Ferenczi: plausible title, believable date, convincing page number, all false. Starting from this scene, this essay traces a genealogy from the Cartesian evil demon to the LLM as a technical realisation of the closed-cognition fantasy, and interrogates a presupposition shared, in different ways, by Putnam's brain-in-a-vat thought experiment, Bostrom's simulation tri...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
4776d968-3513-53f8-ba68-cf596be32171
DOI
10.20944/preprints202606.1914.v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
The Brain in a Vat and the Fourth Proposition: Why the Constitution of the Psychoanalytic Subject Exceeds Computational SufficiencyDOI 10.20944/preprints202606.1914.v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.