Back to search

Article

Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates and Cost-Effectiveness Between GnRH Antagonist and Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocols Running title: Cost-effectiveness of GnRH-ant vs PPOS

2025-06-10

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><italic>Objective: </italic>This study compared the cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) and cost-effectiveness of the GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant) versus progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocols in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). <italic>Methods: </italic>In this retrospective study, women who underwent COS with GnRH-ant or PPOS at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, fr...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
4130de9b-d296-5216-8ce3-3f9cdd41126e
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-6803353/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates and Cost-Effectiveness Between GnRH Antagonist and Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocols Running title: Cost-effectiveness of GnRH-ant vs PPOSDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6803353/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.