Back to search

Article

Concordance of Automated ACMG Variant Classification with Expert-Curated Assertions: A Systematic Evaluation Using the ClinGen Evidence Repository

2026-08-07

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Automated ACMG/AMP variant classification tools are increasingly deployed in clinical genomics, yet systematic evaluations against expert-curated gold standards remain sparse. The ClinGen Evidence Repository provides Expert Panel-adjudicated classifications at the highest evidentiary tier, serving as an ideal concordance benchmark. Results We evaluated VarTriage, a streamin...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
3601310c-bb60-5cbc-9c38-a18e7010500c
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10615801/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Concordance of Automated ACMG Variant Classification with Expert-Curated Assertions: A Systematic Evaluation Using the ClinGen Evidence RepositoryDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10615801/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.