Back to search

Article

Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device

2021-01-04

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Background.</bold> The mandibular opening path movements have different directions according to the craniofacial morphology of the patient but always downward and backward, therefore increasing the collapse of the upper airway. The aim of this work is to determine if there is a relationship between the craniofacial morphology and the mandibular movement to help understand the impa...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
33e7d3b8-d8ba-54fb-a5b9-9a1ce31bc730
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-30273/v5
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement deviceDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-30273/v5
Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device.Semantic proximity
Variations in the alveolar bone morphology in maxillary molar area: a retrospective CBCT studySemantic proximity
Three-dimensional oropharyngeal airway changes in adolescent patients treated with extractions: a preliminary studySemantic proximity
Biomechanical Evaluation of the Right Angled Maxillary Protraction Appliance (RAMPA) with Superior Advance (SupAd) Oral Appliances: A Paradigm Shift in Class III Orthopedic TreatmentSemantic proximity
Individualised Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: Predictive Models and Anatomical Phenotyping of Mandibular Advancement Devices Responses.Semantic proximity
Comparison of impact of three different methods of surgical palatal repair on maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate patientsSemantic proximity
Evaluation and Correlation of Facial Asymmetry in Adults with Class I, Class II, and Class III Skeletal RelationSemantic proximity
Alveolar bone loss around mandibular anterior teeth in Class I, II, and III malocclusions: a CBCT evaluation studySemantic proximity
Technical Note: A Newly Designed Intraoral Device with Enclosed Spring for Controlled Mouth Opening in TMJ HypermobilitySemantic proximity
Comparative analysis for variation of skeletal and dental parameters in bilateral cleft palate in central India population – A Nemoceph studySemantic proximity
What is the impact of Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion on the midfacial soft tissues? A prospective three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry studySemantic proximity
Phenotyping OSA: Conceptualization and Implications for Treatment with Mandibular Advancement Devices.Semantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.