Article

The ethics of patenting DNA

2003-03-01

Abstract excerpt

Should DNA be patented? This paper argues that the patenting of DNA (whether of human or other origin) is in general acceptable and should be regulated by the same rules and practices as govern other patenting. However, patents on DNA sequences have been and are being granted too liberally.

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Biomedical Ethics and Regulation

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 3262c4e3-80c0-58d0-bbd5-cef9bd8c77af
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jcb.3040028

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The ethics of patenting DNADOI 10.1057/palgrave.jcb.3040028Read

The morality of human gene patents.Semantic proximity Read

Law and Science Collide Over Human Gene PatentsSemantic proximity Read

Governing Human Germline Editing Through Patent LawSemantic proximity Read

Ethical aspects of patenting human genotypes according to EC Biotechnology Directive.Semantic proximity Read

Patenting of genetic material: are the benefits to society being realized?Semantic proximity Read

Framing and legitimating EU legal regulation of human gene-editing technologies: key facets and functions of an imaginarySemantic proximity Read

Patenting of human DNA sequences -- implications for prenatal genetic testing.Semantic proximity Read

The ethics of human gene transferSemantic proximity Read

Gene patenting--the Supreme Court finally speaks.Semantic proximity Read

Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversiesSemantic proximity Read

Intellectual Property Landscape of the Human GenomeSemantic proximity Read

Patents in Genomics and Human GeneticsSemantic proximity Read