Back to search

Article

Rethinking Think-Aloud in the Age of Language Models

2025-08-31

Abstract excerpt

<p>Understanding the human mind has long been a central goal of cognitive science, yet behavioral measures such as button presses provide only indirect traces of thought. Think-Aloud protocols, where participants verbalize their reasoning, offer a more direct probe but have long been criticized as unreliable and difficult to scale. Here we revisit this debate using one of the largest Think-Aloud datasets to date—4...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
2c835c79-8f8d-5f52-bdc3-9ca7b39a2bf3
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/6ta3z_v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Rethinking Think-Aloud in the Age of Language ModelsDOI 10.31234/osf.io/6ta3z_v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.