Article

Looking for RED FLAGS: identifying and supporting patients at risk of adverse psychological responses to genetic counselling and testing

2012-01-01

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 27d3ab97-0cf0-548f-844a-c77d3769689a
DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-10-s2-a17
PMCID: PMC3326692

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Looking for RED FLAGS: identifying and supporting patients at risk of adverse psychological responses to genetic counselling and testingDOI 10.1186/1897-4287-10-s2-a17Read

Emerging risks of genetic testing.Semantic proximity Read

Assessment of genetic testing and related counseling services: current research and future directionsSemantic proximity Read

When, how and why BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing is offered to patients who do not meet standard criteriaSemantic proximity Read

Providing solutions–defining problems: the imperative of disease prevention in genetic counsellingSemantic proximity Read

Genetic counselling, patient education, and informed decision-making in the genomic eraSemantic proximity Read

Fears collide as genetic testing moves forward.Semantic proximity Read

Resolving the impasse on predictive genetic testing in minors: will more evidence be the solution?Semantic proximity Read

Raising the profile of genetics in primary careSemantic proximity Read

The genetic testing process: how much counseling is needed?Semantic proximity Read

What should we know about personal genetic testing?Semantic proximity Read

Accuracy and ambiguity in counseling patients about genetic risk.Semantic proximity Read

Genetic testing: is there a right not to know?Semantic proximity Read