Article

Does Generative AI Make Us Think Alike? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Homogenization Effects in Human–AI Co-Creation

2026-04-21

Abstract excerpt

<p>Does generative AI make us think alike? As human–AI co-creation becomes embedded in creative practice, concerns have emerged that creative outputs may exhibit homogenization, as reduced diversity of meanings, across users, even when individual creativity improves. We address this concern through a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis of empirical studies on homogenization in human–AI co-creation (19...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 233b162d-4c77-5861-8d86-ce88b861f75f
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/rz5s4_v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Does Generative AI Make Us Think Alike? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Homogenization Effects in Human–AI Co-CreationDOI 10.31234/osf.io/rz5s4_v1Read

The Role of Human Agency in Human-AI Co-CreativitySemantic proximity Read

A Systematic Review and Empirical Framework for Human-AI Co-Creation in the Conceptual Design ProcessSemantic proximity Read

Uneven Gains of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Creativity Enhancement: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisSemantic proximity Read

Creative or Uncreative Partner: Comparing Humans and AI in Collaborative Creative TasksSemantic proximity Read

Designing Co-Creative Systems: Five Paradoxes in Human-AI CollaborationSemantic proximity Read

Generative AI Does Not Erase Individual Differences in Human CreativitySemantic proximity Read

Has AI Surpassed Humans in Creative Idea Generation? A Meta-AnalysisSemantic proximity Read

The Roles of Idea Generation and Elaboration in Human-AI Collaborative CreativitySemantic proximity Read