Back to search

Article

Exploration and recency as the main proximate causes of probability matching: a reinforcement learning analysis

2017-01-31

Abstract excerpt

<h4>ABSTRACT</h4> Research has not yet reached a consensus on why humans match probabilities instead of maximise in a probability learning task. The most influential explanation is that they search for patterns in the random sequence of outcomes. Other explanations, such as expectation matching, are plausible, but do not consider how reinforcement learning shapes people’s choices. We aimed to quantify how human p...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
1fdc9015-4e83-5957-a796-a75f63d490ba
DOI
10.1101/104752
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Exploration and recency as the main proximate causes of probability matching: a reinforcement learning analysisDOI 10.1101/104752
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.