Back to search

Article

A Comparative Study of Methods for Handling Missing Data in Longitudinal Data with Implications for Causal Inference

2026-06-25

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Objective Confounding bias and missing data are common methodological limitations of longitudinal cohort studies. Existing studies mostly address the two issues separately, while systematic evidence for the optimal combination of missing data handling and confounder control strategies in longitudinal causal inference remains insufficient. This study aimed to provide practical strategy...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
1de5a4b5-1d4b-57ba-b4a5-382130b7ddbd
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10129751/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A Comparative Study of Methods for Handling Missing Data in Longitudinal Data with Implications for Causal InferenceDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10129751/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.