Article

A Large-Scale Comparison of Divergent Creativity in Humans and Large Language Models

2024-09-28

Abstract excerpt

<p>Human-machine partnerships are increasingly used to address grand societal challenges, yet knowledge of the comparative strengths of humans and machines to innovate is nascent. This research compares the ability of humans (N = 9,198) and large language models (LLMs, N = 215,542 observations) to generate novel ideas in an established creativity task. We present three key results. First, human creativity on avera...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 1cf57960-160d-52d4-9b49-4cfe6c2ba9b8
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/xeh64

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

A Large-Scale Comparison of Divergent Creativity in Humans and Large Language ModelsDOI 10.31234/osf.io/xeh64Read

Generative AI Does Not Erase Individual Differences in Human CreativitySemantic proximity Read

The Role of Human Agency in Human-AI Co-CreativitySemantic proximity Read

Artificial Intelligence is More Creative Than Humans: A Cognitive Science Perspective on the Current State of Generative Language ModelsSemantic proximity Read

Human direction drives creativity with large language modelsSemantic proximity Read

Who Holds the Creative Edge? Human or AISemantic proximity Read

Homogenizing Effect of a Large Language Model (LLM) on Creative Diversity: An Empirical Comparison of Human and ChatGPT WritingSemantic proximity Read

Homogenizing Effect of Large Language Models (LLMs) on Creative Diversity: An Empirical Comparison of Human and ChatGPT WritingSemantic proximity Read

AI is Misled by GenAI: Stylistic Bias in Automated Assessment of Creativity in Large Language ModelsSemantic proximity Read

Automatic Scoring of Creative Problem-Solving with Large Language Models: A Comparison of Originality and Quality RatingsSemantic proximity Read