Back to search

Article

Understanding Clinical Reasoning Variability in Medical Large Language Models: A Mechanistic Interpretability Study

2026-01-27

Abstract excerpt

Medical large language models (LLMs) achieving high benchmark accuracy exhibit unexplained variability in clinical tasks, producing errors that clinicians cannot safeguard against. We evaluated clinical reasoning stability in GPT-5, MedGemma-27B-Text-IT, and OpenBioLLM-Llama3-70B using 355 systematic perturbations of physician-validated oncology cases and trained sparse autoencoders on 1 billion tokens from 50,000...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
1cc4088b-6c53-588f-afb3-5c285ecaadf6
DOI
10.64898/2026.01.26.26344845
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Understanding Clinical Reasoning Variability in Medical Large Language Models: A Mechanistic Interpretability StudyDOI 10.64898/2026.01.26.26344845
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.