Back to search

Article

A Comparison between Evidence-Generated Transtibial Sockets and Conventional Computer-Aided Designs, from the Patient’s Perspective

2024-09-18

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Objective</h4> Personalised prosthetic socket design depends upon skilled prosthetists who aim to balance functional human-prosthesis coupling with safe, comfortable load transmission to skin and soft tissues. This study’s objective was to assess the comfort of sockets generated from past computer aided socket design records. <h4>Design</h4> A crossover non-inferiority trial with embedded qualitative interview...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
190480cc-c929-5ee2-9c0b-e1b3fefa2185
DOI
10.1101/2024.09.17.24312762
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A Comparison between Evidence-Generated Transtibial Sockets and Conventional Computer-Aided Designs, from the Patient’s PerspectiveDOI 10.1101/2024.09.17.24312762
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.