Back to search

Article

Physicians' moral distinctions between medical assistance in dying and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in Canada: An interpretive phenomenological analysis.

2024-01-15

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Medical assistance in dying was legalized in Canada following the <italic>Carter v. Canada</italic> ruling of 2015. In spite of legalization, the ethics of medical assistance in dying remain contentious, with a paucity of research regarding physicians’ moral perspectives on the matter. By asking physicians if they perceive the major bioethical accounts as clinically useful,...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
16d7ce83-069a-58f0-b7f4-062ba5f33a29
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-3854025/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Physicians' moral distinctions between medical assistance in dying and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in Canada: An interpretive phenomenological analysis.DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3854025/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.