Back to search

Article

Perception of concatenative vs. neural text-to-speech (TTS): Differences in intelligibility in noise and language attitudes

2020-05-27

Abstract excerpt

<p>In this study, we test two questions of how users perceive neural vs. concatenative text-to-speech (TTS): 1) does the TTS method influence speech intelligibility in adverse listening conditions? and 2) does a user’s ratings of the voice’s social attributes shape intelligibility? We used identical speaker training datasets for a set of 4 speakers (using AWS Polly TTS). In Experiment 1, listeners identified targe...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
14a5c74a-b99f-5efc-95dc-d2b7276ff7b0
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/86wbf
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Perception of concatenative vs. neural text-to-speech (TTS): Differences in intelligibility in noise and language attitudesDOI 10.31234/osf.io/86wbf
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.