Back to search

Article

How can we support research participants who stop taking part? Communications guidance developed through public-researcher collaboration

2024-01-31

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Research study participants can stop taking part early, in various circumstances. Sometimes this experience can be stressful. Providing participants with the information they want or need when they stop could improve participants' experiences, and may benefit individual studies' objectives and research in general. A group of public contributors and researchers at the Clinica...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
1342a1c7-eab2-5d48-98f7-f52e05348476
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-3900066/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
How can we support research participants who stop taking part? Communications guidance developed through public-researcher collaborationDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3900066/v1
Trial Forge Guidance 5: ethical considerations in randomised Studies Within A Trial (SWATs)Semantic proximity
The Development of Theory-Informed Participant-Centred Interventions to Maximise Participant Retention in Randomised Controlled TrialsSemantic proximity
Patient reported outcomes and recruitment rates following the introduction of principled patient information leaflets (PrinciPILs): Protocol for a meta-analysisSemantic proximity
Varieties of silence – A mixed-methods study exploring reasons and justifications for nondisclosure of the use of complementary therapies to physiciansSemantic proximity
Why Do Patients Decline Heart Failure Trials, and What Should We Do About It?Semantic proximity
Protocol for Surveying Participants and Professionals’ Experiences in an International Kidney Transplant Clinical TrialSemantic proximity
Development of a Risk-tailored Approach and Dashboard for Efficient Management and Monitoring of Investigator-Initiated TrialsSemantic proximity
Approaches and experiences implementing remote, electronic consent at the Leeds Clinical Trials Research UnitSemantic proximity
RELEASE (REdressing Long-tErm Antidepressant uSE): Protocol for a 3-arm pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial effectiveness-implementation hybrid type-1 in general practiceSemantic proximity
Clinical Trial Recruiters’ Experiences Working With Trial Eligibility Criteria: Results of an Exploratory, Cross-sectional, Online SurveySemantic proximity
Guidance for reporting clinical trial registry records and published protocols use in systematic reviews of interventionsSemantic proximity
Designing e-consent protocols for pragmatic clinical trials: case studies from a UKCRC clinical trials unitSemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.