Back to search

Article

Comments on “Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race” by D. McFadden et al., 2018, and methodological pitfalls in human population research

2020-12-19

Abstract excerpt

<p>The study reported by McFadden, Pasanen, Maloney, Leshikar and Pho [2018, JASA 143(4):2338-54] investigated the effect of “sex, menstrual cycle and race” on performance in seven psychoacoustical tasks. Out of 35 comparisons related to the “race” factor, 2 were deemed significant by the authors. Based on these observations, the authors concluded that: "racial background needs to be considered when making general...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
11c341b0-5e77-598a-badb-6c040db2c85b
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/ghfpv
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comments on “Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race” by D. McFadden et al., 2018, and methodological pitfalls in human population researchDOI 10.31234/osf.io/ghfpv
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.