Back to search

Article

Comparing Methods for Handling Missing Cost and Outcome Data in Clinical Trial-based Cost-effectiveness Analysis

2021-09-01

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVES: This study compares methods for handling missing data to conduct cost-effectiveness analysis in the context of a clinical study. METHODS: Patients in the Early Endovenous Ablation in Venous Ulceration (EVRA) trial had between 1 year and 5.5 years (median 3 years) of follow-up under early or deferred endovenous ablation. This study compares Complete-Case-Analysis (CCA), multiple imputation using linear...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
0fd438f0-4e39-5aee-ae9d-b8856fc28703
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-479996/v2
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 11 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparing Methods for Handling Missing Cost and Outcome Data in Clinical Trial-based Cost-effectiveness AnalysisDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-479996/v2
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.