Back to search

Article

Conventional Computed Tomographic Calcium Scoring vs Full Chest CTCS for Lung Cancer Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

2019-12-23

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background Conventional CTCS images the mid/lower chest for coronary artery disease (CAD). Because many CAD patients are also at risk for lung malignancy, CTCS often discovers incidental pulmonary nodules (IPN). CTCS excludes the upper chest, where malignancy is common. Full-chest CTCS (FCT) may be a cost-effective screening tool for IPN. Methods A decision tree was created to compare a...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
0f7a4e8b-baa7-537a-af25-8eecadd04fab
DOI
10.21203/rs.2.11996/v3
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Conventional Computed Tomographic Calcium Scoring vs Full Chest CTCS for Lung Cancer Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisDOI 10.21203/rs.2.11996/v3
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.