Back to search

Article

Clinical efficacy of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TTNS) versus Sham therapy (Part I) and TTNS versus Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) (Part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: Protocol for Part I of the two-fold double blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial.

2021-02-10

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Background:</bold> Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) are effective and safe therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults. However, few randomized sham-controlled trials have been conducted in a paediatric population. To our knowledge, both therapies never have been compared in children.<bold>Aim:</bold> The...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
0c7124d4-db9f-5a0b-aa75-e09dda14c0e3
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-35470/v2
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Clinical efficacy of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (TTNS) versus Sham therapy (Part I) and TTNS versus Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) (Part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: Protocol for Part I of the two-fold double blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial.DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-35470/v2
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.