Back to search

Article

In the Eye of the Cyclops: The Classic Case of Cospeciation and Why Paradigms are Important

2015-01-01

Abstract excerpt

Scientific disagreements due to empirical problems—not enough data, not enough of the critical type of data, problems in analyzing the data—are generally short-lived and resolved in the next cycle of data production. Such disagreements are thus transitory in nature. Persistent scientific conflicts, on the other hand, do not necessarily mean some facts are correct and some are wrong, nor do they mean that we do not...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
0bceb853-4151-56be-9f60-b7de88c854c9
DOI
10.1654/4724c.1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
In the Eye of the Cyclops: The Classic Case of Cospeciation and Why Paradigms are ImportantDOI 10.1654/4724c.1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.